AI features that use PHI need more than a provider BAA
Route all AI traffic through Aptible’s gateway and get BAA coverage, audit logging, key management, and cost controls enforced automatically.
Start for free Talk To An Engineer
“Our view: AI in healthcare must be trustworthy, traceable, and controllable, and we won’t compromise security for speed.”
The hard part of using AI in digital health isn’t the AI. It’s everything around it.
To use LLMs with PHI in production, teams need infrastructure for:
- BAA coverage with every AI provider handling PHI
- Audit logging of prompts and responses
- Secure storage for AI logs
- Log export to long-term retention for audits and investigations
- Key management across teams and environments
- Model access controls to govern which systems can call which models
- PHI and PII de-identification to limit exposure in LLM calls and logs without affecting response quality
- Request inspection and traceability for compliance reviews
- Budget and usage controls that stop requests when limits are reached
- Capacity and availability management for production workloads
A BAA from OpenAI or Anthropic covers the provider’s liability. It doesn’t give you audit logging, de-identification, or access controls. Those are still your problem.
Aptible AI Gateway replaces that entire control layer with a single managed gateway.
Compliance at the gateway, not in application code
BAA coverage, audit logging of every request and response, encrypted storage, and no model training on PHI are enforced on every LLM call. The compliance layer lives at the gateway, not in custom application code.
Key management and model governance
Organize usage with scopes for applications, teams, and environments. Restrict which models each scope can access and attribute every request for audit and cost visibility.
PHI de-identification (coming soon)
Reduce scope of PHI exposure by de-identifying sensitive data in requests and logs and restoring it only when needed. PHI is protected without breaking application logic or relying on manual safeguards.
Observability and verification
Inspect actual requests and responses, verify de-identification, and retain logs for compliance and incident review. Controls are visible and provable, not theoretical.
Cost and usage controls
Set budget limits per scope and set alerts or hard stops when thresholds are reached. Usage can be monitored in real time so teams can manage AI spending intentionally.
Production-grade reliability without managing AI infrastructure
Protocol translation, capacity management, and high availability are handled within the gateway. AI traffic runs on production-grade infrastructure designed for reliability and scale.
Managed AI fits into existing systems and workflows
Change models any time, no compliance review needed
Controls apply wherever AI is used, including internal dev work
All requests are logged, secured and auditable
Every tool call your team and agents make, logged, and controlled
AI Gateway governs what models see. MCP Gateway governs what tools your team and agents can call and logs every action they take. If your team is using Claude or ChatGPT with MCP servers, every tool call is controlled at the infrastructure layer.
date range
last 7 days
server
All
tool
All
user
All
Occurred at
Jan 17, 2026
13:11:43 UTC
Jan 17, 2026
13:09:13 UTC
Jan 17, 2026
13:07:49 UTC
Jan 17, 2026
13:05:22 UTC
user
qualification-agent
Robot
Sally G.
Jane D.
qualification-agent
Robot
server
notion
github
github
notion
Tool
notion_notion-update-view
create_pull_request
create_branch
notion_notion-update-view
args
2 args
1 arg
1 arg
2 arg
user agent
claude-code/2.1.141
claude-code/2.1.141
claude-code/2.1.141
claude-code/2.1.141
Developer workflows are part of the risk surface
AI risk doesn't start and end with production features. Engineers use AI in debugging, data exploration, and internal workflows every day. When they connect Claude to internal tools through MCP servers, those connections are part of the same risk surface.
Without an approved path, it becomes difficult to explain and defend how AI is used across the organization when customers ask about PHI handling, data retention, or model training. AI Gateway governs LLM usage wherever it happens. For teams connecting Claude to tools through MCP, Aptible MCP Gateway extends the same controls to tool calls.
Change models without affecting risk
Choosing a model should be a product decision, not a compliance event.
With Aptible AI Gateway, adopting a new model doesn’t require redesigning controls or reopening compliance reviews. Model changes stay within the same managed control layer, so logging, encryption, and guardrails remain consistent as providers, tools, and usage evolve.
Built to evolve as AI workflows change
AI Gateway is designed as a control layer, not a point solution. For teams also using Claude with MCP servers, Aptible MCP Gateway extends governance to tool calls: access control, audit logging, and credential management for every tool an agent or team member can reach.
No compliance events
Switching models or adopting new providers doesn't reopen reviews or require new contracts
Consistent Layer
Same controls across all models and workflows
Extends to tool calls
MCP Gateway applies the same controls to every tool your team and agents can reach
With direct APIs, every provider integration is a separate problem
With direct APIs and DIY
Compliance controls
- BAA coverage
One BAA covers AI Gateway usage
Separate BAAs per provider
Audit logging
Prompts, responses, and metadata logged automatically
Build and maintain your own logging pipeline
Log retention
Log drain support for long-term storage
Design and maintain your own export process
Encryption
Enforced in transit and at rest
Configure and verify per provider
No model training on PHI
Enforced at infrastructure layer
Rely on provider policy and configuration
Audit readiness and breach investigation
Logs and activity history available immediately for audits or incident investigation
Reconstruct activity across systems during audits or breach reviews
Key management and governance
Key organization
Scopes for apps, teams, environments
Manage keys individually through provider accounts
Model access controls
Restrict models per scope
Model access managed separately per provider and integration
Cost attribution
Usage tracked per scope and model
Aggregate bill with limited breakdown and across cost dashboards from different providers
Data protection
De-identification
PHI de-identification is built in to reduce scope of exposure
Build and maintain your own NLP pipeline
Consistency across models
Same controls regardless of provider
Re-implement safeguards per integration
Observability
Request inspection
View actual prompts and responses
Build dashboards or search raw logs
Cost and operations
Budget enforcement
Set alerts and hard stops for requests to limit spend
Monitor spending manually
Protocol translation
Same keys work across supported providers
Maintain separate integrations
Capacity management
Managed within the gateway
Manage rate limits and availability yourself
Time to safe usage
Immediate
Weeks to months
Use Cases
Why teams choose Aptible
AI Gateway supports production AI features and internal workflows that may touch PHI while providing the governance, visibility, and controls required for regulated systems.
Ship AI features that use real patient data
Build LLM-powered workflows such as summarization, extraction, and care coordination that rely on full patient context. AI Gateway provides logging, de-identification, and compliance controls that allow teams to introduce AI features into regulated applications.
Separate production from experimentation
Create scopes for production, development, and internal workflows with different model access rules and budget limits. Teams can explore new models and ideas while keeping production environments stable and governed.
Provide clear evidence during audits and security reviews
Inspect prompts and responses, retain logs for compliance requirements, and demonstrate how PHI was handled across models and environments. AI Gateway gives teams the visibility needed to answer security and diligence questions confidently.
Control cost and operational risk
Set budget limits per scope, and receive alerts or stop requests entirely when thresholds are reached. Unlike cloud billing alerts, this cuts off usage before you exceed it. AI spending becomes predictable and governable, not just visible.
Govern agent workflows alongside LLM usage
As teams extend AI beyond features into agents that call tools and take actions, MCP Gateway extends the same access controls and audit logging to tool calls. Govern both LLM usage and agent tool access from a single control layer.
Keep shipping. Safety happens automatically.
Deploy in minutes.